Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to the newest version of your browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of Construction News, please enable cookies in your browser.

Welcome to the Construction News site. As we have relaunched, you will have to sign in once now and agree for us to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

CITB adds to offsite building buzz

It is a key theme running through the entire skills debate in construction: the industry needs to either modernise or die.

It was the title of Mark Farmer’s 2016 review into the UK’s construction labour model, and more recently held up as part one of the solution to the ‘broken’ housing crisis, with politicians and the industry alike picking offsite and modular schemes as a sort of construction panacea. 

However, though plans such as Aecom’s to build 3,000 homes in their new modular factory, sound good, how will firms find staff to help deliver the new construction methods, be it offsite, modular or 3D-printed homes? 

After all, as Construction News reported this month, the new trailblazing standards are stuck in development mode, with many still due to be signed off. 

The government is about to dissolve itself until a new one is formed after June’s general election.

And the clock is ticking ever louder on Brexit – and the huge labour market it supplies to the construction industry.

If the industry can’t fully decide itself how to train someone to lay a brick, what hope does it have to conjure up the skills needed to deliver modular homes at scale?

The CITB’s plans to deliver training in offsite construction, announced yesterday, has gone someway to finding an answer to this conundrum.

Working with Mr Farmer, the body will work with the industry to develop new training, linked to the CITB levy that can address the skills balance in these key areas.

The plan has one of the key ingredients lacking in the current skills debate, namely: flexibility.

Although the new trailblazing standards are to be welcomed, none of the new standards at present have any provision for offsite manufacture or anything else that may be needed to improve productivity in construction.

Also, the industry can’t wait three years (or more) for a trailblazing standard to be delivered.

The new training regime will allow the development of standalone knowledge courses, link new standards and qualifications to the CITB training grants, support the development of bespoke teaching materials for schools as well as colleges and promote offsite training.

All are measures to be welcomed, and hopefully acted upon in the weeks and months ahead.

The apprenticeship levy, which came into force earlier this month, has put renewed focus on the CITB’s own levy, which has been in place for a number of years.

With grumbles within the industry that it is being ‘double taxed’ by the imposition of two levies, this new initiative may allow the CITB to ensure it remains relevant in the years ahead.

Talking of skills

Check out today’s longer read on a lost generation: why construction can’t afford to lose over-50s

Readers' comments (1)

  • Robert Hudson

    At the risk of alienating a lot of people off site construction is not a novel concept a lot of the industry has been doing it including shopfitting for quite a considerable period of time. This includes drawing in 3D laser scanning and operating very advanced CNC Machinery to improve production & out put. When you can put a block of wood on the bed of a 5 axis machine and an hour later end up with the scale model of an e type jaguar welcome to the 21st century

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.