Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to the newest version of your browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of Construction News, please enable cookies in your browser.

Welcome to the Construction News site. As we have relaunched, you will have to sign in once now and agree for us to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

  • You are here:BIM

Industry fears over government 2016 BIM mandate

A survey by Pinsent Masons has found that around two-thirds of construction businesses believe the government mandate of achieving Level 2 building information modelling on central government projects by 2016 is unachievable.

The survey respondents were primarily design consultants (48 per cent) and main contractors (22 per cent).

Almost all were aware of the Level 2 BIM mandate (98.4 per cent) but 64 per cent of respondents to the survey from 70 businesses in the infrastructure sector said the target was unachievable.

Asked about barriers to achieving Level 2, 27 per cent of respondents cited the absence of collaboration as the most significant barrier while 13 per cent cited a lack of willingness by clients to invest in BIM.

More than half (52 per cent) of respondents cited the integrity of information input into models as a key risk of BIM to their organisation.

The government has said it will use Level 2 BIM on all central government construction projects by 2016, with some departments such as the Ministry of Justice already bringing Level 2 BIM into procurement.

Chris Hallam, partner in Pinsent Masons’ projects, construction and engineering team, said: “The overriding message from our survey points to greater collaboration if BIM is to be a success.

“Collaboration is not, however, a new concept for the industry. For over a generation the government and industry stakeholders have strived to create a utopia of a more collaborative construction industry with some, albeit limited, success. 

“The problem is that the majority of construction contracts are not very collaborative. Risk tends to be allocated in a binary manner, with each party incentivised to look after its own interests – rather than the wider interests of a project. 

“Because the parties’ interests are rarely aligned, this tends not to create an environment where true collaboration is possible – at least not if things go wrong. BIM, however, by its very nature requires a more collaborative environment.”

Two-thirds of those surveyed said existing forms of contract used in the industry and the approaches taken to contracting are not fit for purpose when BIM was taken into account, while 69 per cent said that existing construction contracts fail to adequately address the means by which collaborative contracting can be achieved. 

Mr Hallam said: “This may not make pleasant reading for the publishers of standard form contracts, particularly the NEC and PPC2000 forms which are generally considered to be at the more collaborative end of the spectrum.

“We believe this is evidence of an industry crying out for a different approach – for contractual arrangements that work in a collaborative environment.

“Many believe that the ‘alliancing’ model – a ‘no-fault’-based procurement route where parties share in the success or failure of a project – is where the industry should be heading.

“Indeed, several sectors – including rail and utilities – have embraced alliancing, and we are starting to see other sectors dip their toes in the water.” 

BIM benefits

The top three benefits identified from the use of BIM were:

  • Improvement in the design production process of a construction project (63 per cent);
  • Risk mitigation in terms of better on-site clash detection and/or health & safety risk deduction (57 per cent);
  • Greater clarity and transparency for clients (46 per cent). 


Readers' comments (1)

  • Robert Hudson

    CDM certainly has not achieved the end goal of collaborative working, which it was certainly the desire. Let us hope with the advent of BIM we will see a significant seed change in attitude towards working together. Proper payment terms would be a good start instead of some of the daft schemes that are currently doing the rounds.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.