Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to the newest version of your browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of Construction News, please enable cookies in your browser.

Welcome to the Construction News site. As we have relaunched, you will have to sign in once now and agree for us to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Calls for Scottish Parliament inquiry into Dundee V&A cost hike

An MSP has demanded a Scottish Parliament inquiry into the ballooning costs on Kengo Kuma’s proposed V&A museum in Dundee after it emerged the Scottish government knew of the budget problems nearly a year ago.

Labour’s Claire Baker called for the probe into the troubled £80.1 million project, which is now three years behind schedule and £31 million over budget, following a written response from culture secretary Fiona Hyslop.

Construction News’ sister title Architects’ Journal reported that according to the culture secretary, Dundee City Council had admitted to the Scottish government that the competition-winning waterfront scheme by the Japanese star was going to exceed budget last April.

However a public statement about the spiralling costs was not released until last month. 

Ms Hyslop told Ms Baker: “Dundee City Council kept the Scottish Government informed, within the bounds of commercial confidentiality, of the contract negotiations.

“As part of this, in April 2014, the council informed the Scottish Government the initial estimate price would not be met and there was a potential impact on the site mobilisation planned for August 2014.”

Bam Construct was then put forward by officers to build the V&A in September, almost six months after the council had warned costs could not be met.

Ms Baker replied: ‘There are still many unanswered questions… and it is important we get the openness and transparency that is essential with the use of public funds. 

“It was clear from the beginning that this was a project that was heading towards increased costs and delays.

“The Scottish government have still to fully explain their role in the whole process and that is why I’ll be continuing my calls for a Scottish Parliament inquiry.”

She added that the architects who missed out on the original contest - including New York practice REX who recently hit out at the winning scheme, complaining it could ‘never be built within the assigned competition budget’ - had every right to feel aggrieved.

Baker said: ‘The winning design has already been scaled back and other entrants will be justified in asking why one design was seemingly able to go out with the parameters of the design specification. It now seems that those that worked within the specifications were seemingly disadvantaged.’

Last month the city council announced it had begun its own investigations into the issues led by John McClelland, chairman of the Skills Development Scotland.

A preliminary council probe blamed the cost overruns on the building’s complex structure - particularly the ‘unusual extent’ of temporary works to build external walls - along with construction inflation and low market interest among contractors.

The authority also authorised officers to proceed with a financial bail-out package for the scheme, with the council pledging an extra £6.5 million of funding towards the project.

The Scottish government said it will raise its share of funding from £15m to £25m, while the V&A Museum announced it had been awarded an additional £4.5m by the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) at a meeting of its UK board.

This funding is on top of the orginal grant of £9.4m - £8m for capital - awarded in January 2014.

A spokesman for Dundee City Council said: “A thorough and rigorous review of the background to the situation by independent procurement expert John McClelland has been commissioned on behalf of the council so that lessons may be learned for future projects.

“The results of this review will be brought to the council’s policy and resources as soon as practically possible.”



Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.