Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to the newest version of your browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of Construction News, please enable cookies in your browser.

Welcome to the Construction News site. As we have relaunched, you will have to sign in once now and agree for us to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Chinese developer given two weeks to commit to Crystal Palace scheme

Bromley Council has told Chinese developer ZhongRong Group it has 14 days to commit to its proposed redevelopment of Crystal Palace or risk having the deal ripped up.

Last February ZhongRong named a stellar shortlist of half a dozen of the UK’s biggest hitters, including David Chipperfield, Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners and a collaboration between Zaha Hadid Architects and Anish Kapoor, for the £500 million project to resurrect Joseph Paxton’s south London landmark.

A winner had been expected in the summer with a planning application for the new cultural destination due before the end of 2014.

But negotiations between the Chinese developer and the local authority stalled over the land deal and the company’s 16-month ‘exclusivity agreement’ for the site ran out at the end of January.

The council, backed by the Greater London Authority, confirmed it would start talking with other interested parties unless ZhongRong agreed to ‘a number of financial and business planning-related conditions’ before 20 February.

Architects’ Journal reported Stephen Carr, leader of Bromley Council, said: ‘We need to reassure local people that we remain resolutely focused on doing everything we can to improve Crystal Palace Park and this must include securing its long-term future. It would also be wrong to overlook the exciting potential for much-needed regeneration in this part of London.

‘This is why we have given the ZhongRong Group the opportunity to agree financial and other conditions, which include the preparation of a robust and agreed business plan and implementation timetable. We’ve written to ZhongRong setting out very clearly what they need to do next.’

ZhongRong’s bid to recreate Crystal Palace, which was destroyed by fire in 1936, as a new attraction reflecting the original ‘spirit, scale and magnificence’ of Paxton’s original structure made national headlines.

Billed as a new ‘culture-led exhibition and employment space’, the scheme was set to create up to 2,000 jobs and would incorporate the listed Italianate garden terraces. The scheme was earmarked to sit within Latz + Partners’ existing masterplan for the wider revamp of the surrounding 80ha park.

The judging panel for the design contest included Mayor of London Boris Johnson, RIBA president Stephen Hodder, Peter Murray, the chair of New London Architecture, former CABE chairman John Sorrell and Hank Dittmar from the Prince’s Foundation for Building Community.

ZhongRong was unavailable for comment.

Shortlist in full:

  • David Chipperfield Architects
  • Grimshaw with FutureCity
  • Haworth Tompkins Architects
  • Marks Barfield Architects
  • Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners

Comment:

Tom Chance, Green Party candidate for Lewisham West and Penge:
‘It’s incredible that Bromley Council have let sixteen months pass without the most basic elements of this project being agreed, and are now still leaving the door open to the ZhongRong Group.

‘They’ve wasted the time of the architects who put in proposals, blocked community groups from restoring parts of the park, and scuppered a bid for millions of pounds of lottery funding. The council, and the GLA, need to get back to implementing the adopted masterplan for this park which rules out such a huge over-development of the hill top.’

 

 

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.