Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to the newest version of your browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of Construction News, please enable cookies in your browser.

Welcome to the Construction News site. As we have relaunched, you will have to sign in once now and agree for us to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

  • You are here:HS2

Government warned over 'unaffordable' HS2 in 2012

The government was warned three years ago that High Speed 2 would be unaffordable alongside the Department for Transport’s other spending commitments, it has emerged.

A previously supressed 2012 Cabinet Office report into the project said there was a “lack of a clear picture of the overall cost” of the first phase of HS2, warning that the £16.28bn price tag “excludes some known additional costs”.

The project assessment review, which has only come to light following freedom of information requests by campaigners battling the high-speed link, rated the delivery confidence for the project as “amber/red”, meaning officials highlighted a number of risks to completion.

These risks included land access from landowners affected by the route of new line, as well as “a campaign or resistance from stakeholders”.

The report also recommended that the Department for Transport and the Treasury agree “a timeline and strategy” for assessing the affordability of the project, warning that the cost “may become a risk without an owner”.

On the issue of affordability, the report said: “The Department [for Transport] believes… that the costs of this project are so large, and over such a long period, that it will not be able to afford it alongside all its other likely spending commitments.”

The report was released just hours after transport secretary Patrick McLoughlin announced a review of Network Rail’s £38.5bn five-year investment programme, amid mounting criticism of the operator.

Readers' comments (2)

  • I strongly believe that UK plc would benefit much from a huge investment in high speed broadband to make the highest speeds available to all. Such an investment would reduce the need for traditional transport links, people would be able to work from home, a green benefit, meetings would be held on line and business could be transacted on line significantly more than is currently possible. I do not understand why successive governments continue to invest in outdated technology. Britain could be a world leader in high speed communication technology, it would attract overseas investment and bring brains back to Britain.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Totally agree. Even just making broadband work properly on trains, with decent phone signals would help much more than slightly faster trains. Working on trains is a very valuable use of travel time, but at the moment is frustrated by poor communications.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.