Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to the newest version of your browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of Construction News, please enable cookies in your browser.

Welcome to the Construction News site. As we have relaunched, you will have to sign in once now and agree for us to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

  • You are here:HS2

HS2 CEO says slower trains among 'number of options'

HS2 could run fewer trains at a lower speed if changes are needed to finish the project on budget and on time.

MP Andrea Leadsom wrote to HS2 chief executive Mark Thurston (pictured) to raise concerns that he had told a meeting in parliament about the option, the Sunday Telegraph reported.

According to Ms Leadsom, Mr Thurston told the group that “these changes included possibly the speed the trains will operate at on the line by around 50 km/h, reducing the number of trains from 18 per hour to 14, and changing from a slab track to a ballast track”.

In her letter written in November, Ms Leadsom said: “Given that the HS2 business case was first predicated upon speed, then on capacity, then finally on improving connectivity with the north, can I ask how these changes – separately and cumulatively – would impact on the viability of the project?”

In a response to Ms Leadsom this month, the chief executive said he was simply outlining “a number of options” at the meeting in parliament.

He added: “I was also clear that HS2 Ltd is working to the scope and budget of the project which the government has set, and for which detailed debate in parliament has taken place.”

In December, former land and property director for the scheme, Doug Thornton claimed the cost estimates presented to parliament about the scheme were hundreds of millions of pounds too low on the BBC’s Panorama.

Mr Thurston told the programme that he was confident about the budget and that “it’s perfectly normal” for costs to change over time.

 

Readers' comments (1)

  • I would say that, firstly the article seems to suggest that the speed would be around 50 km/hr rather than the original design reduced by that amount.

    Mr Thurston added “I was also clear that HS2 Ltd is working to the scope and budget of the project which the government has set, and for which detailed debate in parliament has taken place.” Does Mr Thurston not realise that the original budget was £33bn now predicted at £100bn? Does Mr Thurston not accept that that the information provided for the debate was a tad "misleading"?

    I tried to book to travel from Buckinghamshire to Manchester for two people standard class in early January, the price - return was between £260 and £400 so, of course we went door to door by car. When we have spent £100bn destroying our countryside in the construction and, understanding that you cannot join the train in Buckinghamshire, what will the tickets cost?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.