Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to the newest version of your browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of Construction News, please enable cookies in your browser.

Welcome to the Construction News site. As we have relaunched, you will have to sign in once now and agree for us to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

A post-PFI future for Scotland

The launch of the Scottish Futures Trust is an opportunity to slash contractors’ bid costs. By Kevin McKee

The Scottish Government recently unveiled its long-awaited proposal for financing and delivering major public projects.

The initiative, the Scottish Futures Trust, will replace the widely-criticised Private Finance Initiative and heralds a golden opportunity for the delivery of high quality projects which represent value for money.

The proposal for the SFT is about aspirations, with the details yet to be fleshed out. However, we know that the SFT will be structured as two companies - a public company, providing advice to the public bodies that are planning major infrastructure investment, and a private company, to provide private investment for these projects.

The scheme will be rooted in the principles of non-profit distribution and will cap the “extreme” private sector profits associated with PFI deals.

It will aim to provide high quality infrastructure and, in so doing, rebuild confidence in partnerships between the public and private sector.

The key to the SFT’s success will lie in the detail, which is expected later this year.

Lessons learned from PFI should be taken into account to improve the SFT’s chances of success.

The Scottish Government must structure the SFT to ensure that quality standards are raised. A criticism of PFI was that the design process was very often contractor-led. The SFT could hand control of the design process back to the public body.

A basic design, from which bidding contractors could suggest innovations, should be stipulated. This way, a quality design would underpin all public infrastructure.

Alternative approaches to risk should be encouraged, with the aim of driving innovation and value for money.

Other procurement routes should also be open to public bodies. PFI projects were primarily procured under the Competitive Dialogue Procedure, which resulted in high bid costs for contractors.

The simpler Restricted Procedure route could, where appropriate, be used for the SFT, encouraging more contractors to tender for projects - thus increasing competition - and allowing them to spend less on bids and more on design innovation.

Urgent action

Time is now critical to the success of the SFT. Since PFI was scrapped by the Scottish Government, infrastructure investment in Scotland has stalled. High calibre bidders have turned their back on the Scottish market.

In the current economic downturn in the construction industry, now is an ideal opportunity to tempt them back with quality projects and simplified procurement routes.

Without reputable, experienced bidders, high quality infrastructure is unlikely to become a reality.

A pathfinder project should be put out to the market to assess problems and issues arising out of the SFT.

If successful, this pathfinder could instil renewed confidence in public bodies, contractors and, most importantly, the Scottish public.

Kevin McKee is a solicitor on the PFI team of law firm Shepherd & Wedderburn