Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to the newest version of your browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of Construction News, please enable cookies in your browser.

Welcome to the Construction News site. As we have relaunched, you will have to sign in once now and agree for us to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Energy reg scheme 'will not save cash'

MATERIALS

ACOUSTIC test engineers have hit back at claims that introducing robust detail compliance methods for new energy efficiency regulations would trim developers' costs.

They claimed that on large housing developments contractors would be better off carrying out air leakage tests to check compliance to Approved Document Part L of the building regulations rather than using standardised building methods under the robust details scheme.

James Mitchell, managing director of Ipswich-based testing engineer Construction Performance Consulting, said: 'On sites with a large number of units it is more economical to carry out air leakage tests.

Using testing to prove compliance will, for most building sites, be inexpensive compared against the project value.' Mr Mitchell said: 'There are a host of added benef its of using air leakage testing.'