Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to the newest version of your browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of Construction News, please enable cookies in your browser.

Welcome to the Construction News site. As we have relaunched, you will have to sign in once now and agree for us to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

More work needed on rats and plastic pipes


IN RESPONSE to the letter from Stuart Godfrey, of Uponor, regard-ing plastic pipes (Construction News, December 4), I too have read the Robens Institute report on rat infestations.

Interestingly, one point which Mr Godfrey fails to mention is that 40 per cent of the environmental health officers who responded to the survey had experience of rats damaging plastic pipes.

I would fully accept Mr Godfrey's view that the sample was 'hardly sizeable', but plastic pipes clearly have some susceptibility to rodent attack and more work is obviously needed, given the important public health implications.

Second, to claim that 'flexibility in pipe systems ... is a benefit to aid asset life' is totally misleading. The integrity of a plastic pipeline basically depends on an appropriate gravel bed and surround.

Even then, plastic pipes flatten and lose strength over time, in contrast to rigid pipe alternatives.

This is the reason why plastic pipe manufacturers are unable to give the 100 year-plus guarantees offered by their rigid pipe competitors.

Edward Naylor

Managing director

Naylor Clayware

Clough Green