Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to the newest version of your browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of Construction News, please enable cookies in your browser.

Welcome to the Construction News site. As we have relaunched, you will have to sign in once now and agree for us to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Brexit: UK workers 'unlikely' to make up EU shortfall

Boosting training of UK nationals to replace EU workers post-Brexit is unlikely to be sufficient to tackle the shortfall, accountancy firm PwC has warned. 

In a report on post-Brexit economic prospects, PwC highlighted that EU migrants make up around 10 per cent of the UK construction industry’s workforce.

In London, this figure rises to 30 per cent, based on 2016 figures from the Office for National Statistics.

In March, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors warned more than 175,000 construction workers could be lost due to a hard Brexit.

A push to attract and train more UK-born workers to construction, which has been advocated by a number of industry leaders, is unlikely to produce the necessary results in time, PwC warned.

“In the long run, efforts could be made to fill skill gaps arising from lower EU migration through enhanced training of UK nationals and automation,” the report said.

“But, realistically, such alternatives are unlikely to make up for any large reduction in EU migrant workers over the next five to 10 years.”

The comments chime with those made by Build UK’s new chairman, Mark Castle, to Construction News in September

The industry has been looking at new ways to attract UK talent.

In September, Kier launched an initiative committing to staff visiting schools as career ambassadors.

PwC’s report also forecast that overall UK GDP growth will slow to 1.4 per cent next year, down from 1.5 per cent in 2017.

“This reflects slower consumer spending growth, offset by some rise in UK exports and public investment,” the report said.

“But risks to growth are weighted to the downside due to Brexit.”

Readers' comments (1)

  • This really is not a problem, we tend to forget that there is a world of difference between coming here to work and immigration. I worked in Canada for some years, I had a work permit, paid the non-resident tax (deducted at source) and I (note not my extended family) was entitled to the same facilities as a citizen whilst there but no pension, unemployment payments, sick pay or redundancy. I could have applied for residency (in fact the Canadian government asked me to and continues to ask me (had I been younger I would have taken them up on their kind offer. It should be remembered however that Canada is economically under populated; the UK is however economically very seriously over populated.

    I bet no one at its inception understood the freedom of movement of EU personal as anything other than for work and certainly not residency or rights for families.

    I understand that the Government is currently consulting on immigration and also understand from an MP that the DEFRA statistics on UK sustainable population and that most of those involved if not (highly probably) all do not know what it is. Do you (worth a Google)?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.