Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to the newest version of your browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of Construction News, please enable cookies in your browser.

Welcome to the Construction News site. As we have relaunched, you will have to sign in once now and agree for us to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Khan's Brexit report says construction most at risk

Construction will be the worst affected major industry following Brexit, according to a study commissioned by mayor of London Sadiq Khan.

The report, produced by data analyst Cambridge Econometrics, looked at the effects on trade, investment and labour on different sectors of the UK under four different Brexit scenarios.

Under the ‘softest’ Brexit scenario, in which the UK leaves the customs union but remains in the single market to retain free movement of goods and people, construction’s contribution to total UK GDP would decline by 3.5 percentage points – the biggest decline out of any sector, the report found. 

In the event of the ‘hardest’ form of Brexit – no transition deal, no membership of the customs union or single market, and trading under World Trade Organisation rules, the industry’s contribution would fall by 8.2 percentage points – with only agriculture’s share facing a bigger fall.

Arcadis market intelligence lead Will Waller said: “It confirms a lot of what we all fear.”

He added: “We’ve done quite a bit on the ‘hard Brexit’ scenario and for construction it would be really bad news.

“The industry needs to be pushing hard to make the government aware of this.”

Cambridge Econometrics attributed the industry’s potential decline to difficulties in acquiring labour; the knock-on effect of a slowdown in the wider economy; exposure to non-tariff barriers, such as quotas and trade licences on imports and exports; and falls in investment.

The data analyst said: “Once the UK leaves the single market, it is likely that the skills shortage could get worse if the new agreements don’t allow for free movement of people.

“This could result in even higher pressures on wages as labour supply contracts, causing construction firms to face considerably higher project costs.”

The report also highlighted that the UK had benefited from €7.8bn of European Investment Bank investment in infrastructure projects, and that SMEs received €666m in European Investment Fund loans during 2015 alone.

The country will lose access to both of these funding sources after Brexit, the study noted, which could “significantly impact the ability of firms to deliver big infrastructure projects such as HS2 and reduce development opportunities for start-ups”.

RICS London policy manager Abdul Choudhury said: ”The UK Government must act promptly to keep EIB funding or introduce a new lender or lending mechanism to plug the gap created from the potential loss of EIB funds, particularly for shovel ready projects that are of great importance to London.”

Mr Waller pointed out that Cambridge Econometics have been forced to make many assumptions in its work, however, and others are sceptical of its reliability.

CPA economics director professor Noble Francis said: “Forecasting the next 12-18 months is challenging enough given the uncertainties around so Cambridge Econometrics attempting to forecast the effect of a hard Brexit on the economy and construction by 2030 is dubious to say the least.

”According to the research, overall impact of a hard Brexit would be a 3 per cent hit to the economy by 2030 but the margins of error must be greater than that.”

Mr Waller also noted that there were threats to construction that were not covered clearly in the report which also needed to be addressed.

“Just disruptions in customs could lead to practical delays in delivery of materials,” he said.

“So we’re all going to have to think about our projects in terms of: do we need to change our procurement, do we need to stockpile materials. And that planning needs to start now.”

He suggested that one possible silver lining could be a decline in commercial construction freeing up the supply chain to put more resources into housebuilding.

The mayor of London said the report emphasised the risks the country faced and called on the government to do more to avoid a hard Brexit.

Mr Khan said: “If the government continues to mishandle the negotiations, we could be heading for a lost decade of lower growth and lower employment.

“The analysis concludes that the harder the Brexit we end up with, the bigger the potential impact on jobs, growth and living standards.

“Ministers are fast running out of time to turn the negotiations around. A ‘no deal’ hard Brexit is still a very real risk – the worst possible scenario.”

Readers' comments (1)

  • This is ridiculous. I went to the local Conservative MPs meeting on Brexit recently. I and everyone else there could not understands why we were not explaining to the EU countries/manufacturers/individuals what the great advantage of retaining a free trade agreement with the UK would be.

    If they finished assembly of their products in new UK facilities they would be freed from all the EU of government/tax assistance when availing themselves of the UK's free trade agreements with the rest of the world.

    The UK can incentivise the new facilities as they did with Nissan in Sunderland. It was EU regulations that stopped the bale out of TATA steel and caused so much unemployment.

    So much construction work would/wil start.

    Pity is we went the Article 50 route rather than offering free trade immediately to all 27 countries using essentially the current terms without any of the restrictions.

    David A Roberts

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.