Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to the newest version of your browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of Construction News, please enable cookies in your browser.

Welcome to the Construction News site. As we have relaunched, you will have to sign in once now and agree for us to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Hitachi in 'exclusive' Wylfa talks with Bechtel and JGC over EPC contracts

Two firms, including one new entrant to the UK nuclear sector, are in pole position to take the engineering, procurement and construction contractor role on Hitachi’s £8bn Wylfa nuclear plant in Anglesey.

Hitachi told Construction News it had entered “exclusive discussions” with US firm Bechtel and Japanese-based JGC Corporation over the contract on Horizon’s Welsh nuclear project, with the pair expected to work together if awarded the role.

A Hitachi spokesman said: “We can confirm we are in exclusive discussions with two companies – Bechtel and JGC Corporation – regarding a potential role in the EPC delivery team for Wylfa Newydd.”

Construction News understands the pair saw off challenges from US-based firms Fluor and Chicago Bridge & Iron Company.

The news marks a significant step forward for the project, which will be run by Horizon Nuclear Power, coming almost three years after Hitachi bought the site for £700m from German utilities company RWE and E.ON in October 2012.

Sources said Hitachi had been in discussions with potential tier one contractors and suppliers since the purchase.

The Hitachi spokesman added: “We can say that it is our intention to put together a delivery team which will build on our knowledge of deploying the ABWR [advanced boiling water reactor], adding extensive global experience.

“This progress will also pave the way for significant involvement of UK firms throughout the supply chain.”

If selected, the contract would mark JGC’s first venture into the UK energy construction sector.

The Yokohama-based energy specialist has worked on projects across Asia, Africa, Australia and Europe, but so far has only been involved on one UK project: Unilever’s Colworth Research Laboratory.

Bechtel has been involved in major infrastructure projects such as Crossrail, High Speed 1 and the Jubilee line extension in recent years.

It is also working on the multi-billion-pound Watts Bar nuclear plant in Tennessee.

A Bechtel spokeswoman said: “Although it’s premature to discuss specifics, we see great promise in joining the capabilities of Bechtel and Hitachi to deliver a new nuclear power station at Wylfa.

“Bechtel has completed complex mega-projects in the UK for 60 years and is currently completing construction of the first new nuclear generating unit this century in the United States.”

Construction at Horizon’s Wylfa site will involve replacing the existing Magnox reactors, the last of which is set to be shut down later this year - with new UK ABWR.

These reactors are said to be the most advanced in the world and will be capable of providing 2.7 GW of energy output, enough to power more than five million homes.

The project is expected to see the creation of 8,500 jobs during its peak construction period.

Readers' comments (3)

  • Why are large contracts always described as "lucrative"? If you look at the financial performances of UK main contractors over the past few years you will realise that many contracts - no doubt described as "lucrative" in the Construction Press at the time of award - turn out to be the opposite.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tom Fitzpatrick


    Thanks for the comment. I agree with the premise that there is no guarantee this will be lucrative.

    There is more than just monetary context here, given the scope for potential future work (in nuclear at Oldbury and non-nuclear) with a massive client (as well as a Japanese firm making its first big play in the UK market).

    In the context of profits, it's obviously impossible to tell whether it will be lucrative at this point, it's more about the scale of project, attention and future workloads.

    The word 'lucrative' isn't one we've used often (though we have used it), but will bear in mind this feedback and have removed the word from this article. Hope you enjoyed the rest of the article!

    Many thanks.

    Tom Fitzpatrick
    Deputy Editor
    020 3033 2748

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • output for the cost looks far more effective than Hinkley, Maybe they should be given the opportunity to provide a better solution before Hinkley goes too far?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.