Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to the newest version of your browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of Construction News, please enable cookies in your browser.

Welcome to the Construction News site. As we have relaunched, you will have to sign in once now and agree for us to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

CSCS sets qualifying pace as old systems phased out

With a number of old systems being phased out, the Construction Skills Certification Scheme has accelerated plans on ensuring the industry is 100 per cent qualified rather than 100 per cent carded.

Over the last few years the Construction Skills Certification Scheme (CSCS) has been on a mission. 

Supported by the Construction Leadership Council (CLC), the scheme has put in place a structured plan to return to its original purpose: to ensure that all people carrying out construction-related roles on site hold the appropriate qualifications.

The move follows a period, starting in the early-to-mid 2000s, when the scheme lost its focus and, at the behest of the industry, moved to issuing cards for everyone who needed to access a construction site, rather than ensuring only those working in construction-related roles required a card. The result was that even those visiting a site to refill a vending machine were issued with a card.

Refocused strategy

However, the pendulum is once again moving decisively back towards the CSCS’ original purpose. 

“In the last few years the scheme’s strategic direction has been firmly focused on the achievement of nationally recognised construction related qualifications,” says CSCS head of communications Alan O’Neile. “There have been a number of changes over the last few years to ensure card holders achieve a qualification.”

Probably the most well-known of those changes was the introduction of the Labourer card back in 2014, requiring an applicant to achieve a level 1 qualification. 

More recently, CSCS withdrew the Construction Related Occupation (CRO) card in March last year; a move that affected over 350,000 card holders. Those card holders are now obliged to put a plan in place to move from the CRO card and, where appropriate, register for a recognised qualification.

Now CSCS is taking the next step towards full qualification by withdrawing the Construction Site Visitor card. The card was intended for those people who from time to time visit sites but weren’t in construction roles. “The only requirement was to pass the CITB Health, safety and environment test,” Mr O’Neile says.

“What’s different to the withdrawal of the CRO card is that a large number of these people should never have had cards in the first place” 

Alan O’Neile, CSCS

“We have 120,000 people holding the Site Visitor card – it is relatively easy to obtain and doesn’t require a construction-related qualification. People obtain the card because their employers tell them to in order to satisfy their 100 per cent carded policy. Far more cards were issued than was ever intended because the industry was insisting that everyone had a card, so many non-construction-related staff got themselves one.”

Last month, CSCS set out a timeline for the withdrawal of the Site Visitor card. From 3 September this year all Site Visitor cards issued will expire in August 2020, thereby introducing a two-year lifespan as opposed to the previous five-year period. Furthermore from 28 February 2020 CSCS will stop issuing the card entirely.

“Much like the withdrawal of the CRO card we want to give the industry time to get used to this change,” Mr O’Neile says. “The idea of this timeline is to give the industry, individual card holders and employers sufficient time and the right amount of information to put plans in place to move off the card with the minimum of fuss.”

Contractor engagement

For many Site Visitor cards holders, the process will involve no action on their part. Technically, they never needed a card anyway. “What’s different to the withdrawal of the CRO card is that a large number of these people should never have had cards in the first place – they don’t work in construction-related occupations,” Mr O’Neile says. “So the likelihood is that a large number don’t need another CSCS card.”

However, quite apart from the need to communicate the change to card holders, CSCS also needs principal contractors to engage with it.

“One problem we face is that many principal contractors still have 100 per cent carded policies,” Mr O’Neile says. “That indicates a misunderstanding of the scheme. It undermines industry’s desire for a fully qualified workforce, as opposed to a fully carded workforce. We’re calling on the industry to scrap its 100 per cent carded policies.”

However, that does not mean that contractors won’t need to take action. 

“We’re asking the industry to have plans in place to look after non-construction-related people,” Mr O’Neile adds. “The withdrawal of the Site Visitor card will see more people arriving on site without a card and the industry needs to have the plans in place to manage these individuals. What that plan looks like depends on the individual site but it would normally include a site induction so that the individual will be aware of the dangers on that particular site.”

Moving from a 100 per cent carded workforce to a 100 per cent qualified workforce is not without its challenges. But it should result in a safer and more productive construction workforce with appropriate supervision for non-construction workers.

Readers' comments (5)

  • Having held a CSCS card since its inception, I am now having to have a Visitors card as my category (Quality) is no longer listed, yet I am on site as much as my colleagues in the construction management roles, and i have a team of inspectors, engineers and managers who are also in the same position, withdrawal of the Visitor card is fine but ensure that all non construction trades who are on site regularly have suitable category cards and ensure that the professional body is recognised to enable members to achieve the appropriate level card.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So now everyone has cards, to keep the gravy train rolling it's going to switch to something else subsidised by those held to ransom into getting the news tickets or not being able to work, and yet we wonder why operatives are moving onto other industries, or simply not joining it, thus adding to an already significant lack of labour resources and huge wage inflation.

    We're all trying to stop the industry killing people but this inefficient bureaucratic cartel is killing the industry.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It has never been more important to promote the vocational development environment on sites, where both construction workers and senior professionals can actually achieve a qualification based on their competence.

    CLC is to support the formal vocational qualifications by 2020 in ensuring that the Construction Industry operates a fully qualified workforce.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Removal of the right to work, with no democratic debate, no legislation, no economic or social impact studiee, circumventing the non retrospective principles of our common laws. Where are we living? In Putin's Russia?
    CSCS is a fine example of how the liberal and socialist elite are removing our rights by stealth.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Visitor cards have been essential for anyone that doesn't fall directly into cscs categories, but is going to access site for whatever reason, driver deliveries, vistors to undertake other activity, (skips, deliveries), (other jobs, IT support?), cleaners, security, for customers/site persons, or access were all provided for, through visitor cards, because it's essential for people on site to have gone through and seen "the training", and understood a standard induction, or to deal with the policies and procedures higher up the chain.

    Removing visitor cards will be a disaster waiting to happen, because they were the compromise allowing people to visit and demonstrate they'd been trained through a third party mechanism. It will lead to further dissent and accusations of "gravy train", as evidenced in comments above, and less respect for what the core objective was supposed to be - safety,- to a money making scheme.

    What will be the alternative to "visiting"?

    no client visits to site? no non-approved qualification (ipaf),(ncrq) - lets insist they don't exist and not recognise them, (till we can't find staff).
    are alternative schemes not the real target of this wonderful idea?

    - what happens with those who did/do "in-house" tickets that have been done thus far for employers, (as that's all they do) and what to do with industry recognised training not-approved by CITB?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.