Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to the newest version of your browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of Construction News, please enable cookies in your browser.

Welcome to the Construction News site. As we have relaunched, you will have to sign in once now and agree for us to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

NAO: Osborne sidestepped Garden Bridge funding process

Government funding for London’s Garden Bridge project may not have been approved had normal procedures been followed, according to the National Audit Office (NAO)

As reported in The Guardian, NAO comptroller Amyas Morse has written to the public accounts committee claiming that chancellor George Osborne sidestepped the usual processes for approving Department for Transport (DfT) funding.

As revealed by Construction News’ sister title Architects’ Journal in September, the committee is currently investigating The Treasury and Mr Osborne’s decision to give £30m of taxpayers’ money to help fund the controversial project.

Mr Morse’s letter said: “It is important to note that the results would not in normal circumstances suggest a compelling value for money case … The department’s own quantitative analysis suggested that there may or may not be a net benefit and, especially once concerns over deliverability were taken account of, the project might well not have met the department’s normal threshold for allocating its finite funds.

”In this context it is important to recognise the wider context, particularly: the initial funding commitments were made by the chancellor to the mayor of London, without the DfT’s involvement.”

The letter added: ”The garden bridge is expected to be predominantly financed through private donations. However, public money was transferred at an early stage in order to allow expenditure on pre-contract award activities with a view to kickstarting fundraising efforts. While this rationale is clear, the timing puts the public sector … at a higher risk than private finance sources of funding proving abortive.”

Comment:

Bee Emmott, executive director of the Garden Bridge Trust

”The public funding that we have received from the DfT and TfL is because of the clear public transport case for the bridge and to help unlock private funding for the project and it has done just that.

“We have £145m pledged which includes £85million from private sources which has been raised in the last 18 months. We have a robust business case and we are confident we will reach our targets. The Trust will fund both the construction of the Garden Bridge and the ongoing maintenance and operations. We announced Sky as a major founding donor this week and have several other sponsor announcements to make in the next few weeks. We are building momentum all the time.”

A Department for Transport spokesperson

”Our £30m funding is crucial to help get this iconic new outdoor space in central London off the ground and act as a catalyst to generate private sector funding.

”This funding to TfL is subject to strict criteria to ensure value for money for the taxpayer, including that securing private funding should be a priority.

“It is now up to the Garden Bridge Trust to ensure they work with their partners to make the bridge a reality.”

In October, it emerged that London mayor Boris Johnson flew to San Francisco in an effort to win corporate sponsorship for a garden bridge before his administration had given official backing for the scheme.

In response, a spokesman for the Department for Transport said that its contribution had been ”subject to a business case that demonstrated value for money for the taxpayer, and fulfilled government’s standard requirements”, adding that the funding had a ”number of detailed conditions attached to it, including a cap on the amount that can be used before the start of construction”.

 

 

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.